Quote:
Originally Posted by kedabra
No one is saying that renewables are cost free to the environment. there are planty of examples of failed renewable projects.
For instance there was a wind farm in Scotland which caused a bog slide (peat bog is one of the most efficient carbon storing landscapes) that effectively released more carbon than the wind farm would ever have offset (assuming the energy was made instead with fossil fuels). Building roads and concrete foundations also releases carbon, and roads through peat bog are very damaging to the bog even several hundred feet from the access roads. so there could be arguments for not putting them on peat bogs.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4557255.stm
.
|
I'm afriad there are whole arguements for not putting wind farms near most costal areas alone just because those are important to birds. Wind energy developers constantly underplay the mortality factors turbines have on birds, but the old Internet really comes through this time. Check this out:
http://www.windaction.org/videos/23904 There are so many more issues than carbon offsets.
Over in Palm Springs, California, the wind developers never come up with the evidence when asked, but you ask any old timer who lived there before the wind farms, you will find that they don't see any birds out there anymore. Wind energy is hammering bat populations and whole ecological systems will suffer if we plaster a whole area with turbines.
http://www.batsandwind.org/ Plus, you don't want to live within two miles of one of these. The high frequency sound waves fuck up your health.