Man...
This would be really awesome, if it didn't have such a high potential to be our big brother. In a few years, there may really be a thought police

.
Hopefully this technology gets used properly. I could see this being incredibly useful in psychology/psychiatry/neurology research, as well as perhaps animal psychology. It may even be able to be used for communication some day (for dumb or deaf people especially). Hell, it would even be a nice art-tool

.
But then, if they began using this in criminal cases, and in security-related things, that would just outweigh all of the positives. Maybe if they only used it for murder-cases or something, then that would be a good thing (though, then again, the privacy of INNOCENT suspects may be invaded in the worst manner possible. Perhaps even for murder cases and other crimes which are actually serious it's not a good idea to use this thing).
That's an interesting discussion topic. Do you guys think there's any legal/criminal related situation were this thing's use would be appropriate?
In any case, I'm somewhat skeptical to even believe this thing actually exists, although I did do a google search and there were a few other sources. I would be curious to see for myself how accurately it draws these things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by skunkjar
Great Brittan is lucky- they have Torchwood to take alien technology and make it available to us humans... lol.
|
I thought this took place in U.C. Berkely?
Edit: Saw some youtube videos on things related to this (though all the videos were a bit old, and seemed to capture this things' predecessors more than anything).
Right now, in regards to the ethics of using this in crime cases, I think that it should be the defendants choice whether he/she wants to be "read" or not. Refusing to be read shouldn't be taken as evidence against the defendant, but I do believe that it would be good if people could use this to prove themselves innocent. (Though this isn't exactly related to the original topic, I believe that it is much much worse to have an innocent person being found guilty than it is to not find the real criminal. I would gladly trade not catching 10 murderers if it meant saving 1 person from being wrongfully convicted.)